Mr. AT:lottoarchitect wrote: ↑Fri Jul 07, 2017 1:51 pm......I also think I gave the impression that the low->hill model is a primary selection method, however, I stated this model is to reinforce your selection. The primary selection method for those who want to use the graphs is the regularity of hits displayed by the red line, ...... I also said the low->hill model is a fine detail, ...... More important is the delay behavior really if you want to dive in graphs more, this GAT here should have a very nice, concentrated in a small range, hits delay graph which is more important compared to the low->hill model. ......
According to my learning and understanding, the main feature of GAT/2.3b just is to transfer the selection of Lotto numbers to the selection of GAT(s). We would get some good results if we could find the best GAT(s). So how can we find the best GAT(s) for our lotto games should always be the key problem to all users!
According to my learning and understanding, not only the low->hill model is a primary selection method of the best GAT(s) but also it's an only selection method from your Help menu and all instructions before. In other words, I have not yet looked another or other selection method (s) here until now. But today you said: hits delay graph which is more important compared to the low->hill model. ......
Since this opinion is the newest and I have not yet found it from your all posts here by 07/07/2017,
I have to think about it carefully but still not sure why? (Sorry, about that)
Could you explain the reason further with an example?
Also, there are three photos including Overall delay hits, Summary (X hits) and Actual (X hits)
in hits delay graph. Which one is more important or main photo?
Because your new version still is No End In Sight, we have to use the only method: Low->Hill model or Hits Delay photo to search for the best GAT(s). So I think you can understand why I ask this question.
Please let me know asap any wrong understanding above. Thanks.